DDMODEL00000078: Chalret_2014_Abexinostat

  public model
Short description:
Semi-mechanistic Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic model of abexinostat-induced thrombocytopenia in both lymphoma and solid tumour patients, based on Friberg et al (2002). The model includes a different platelet baseline counts for each patient population (lymphoma or solid tumour) and a disease progression component for patients with lymphoma.
PharmML (0.6.1)
  • Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic modeling of abexinostat-induced thrombocytopenia across different patient populations: application for the determination of the maximum tolerated doses in both lymphoma and solid tumour patients.
  • Chalret du Rieu Q, Fouliard S, White-Koning M, Kloos I, Chatelut E, Chenel M
  • Investigational new drugs, 10/2014, Volume 32, Issue 5, pages: 985-994
  • Clinical Pharmacokinetics Department, Institut de Recherches Internationales Servier, Suresnes, France.
  • BACKGROUND: In the clinical development of oncology drugs, the recommended dose is usually determined using a 3?+?3 dose-escalation study design. However, this phase I design does not always adequately describe dose-toxicity relationships. METHODS: 125 patients, with either solid tumours or lymphoma, were included in the study and 1217 platelet counts were available over three treatment cycles. The data was used to build a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PKPD) model using a sequential modeling approach. Model-derived Recommended Doses (MDRD) of abexinostat (a Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor) were determined from simulations of different administration schedules, and the higher bound for the probability of reaching these MDRD with a 3?+?3 design were obtained. RESULTS: The PKPD model developed adequately described platelet kinetics in both patient populations with the inclusion of two platelet baseline counts and a disease progression component for patients with lymphoma. Simulation results demonstrated that abexinostat administration during the first 4 days of each week in a 3-week cycle led to a higher MDRD compared to the other administration schedules tested, with a maximum probability of 40 % of reaching these MDRDs using a 3?+?3 design. CONCLUSIONS: The PKPD model was able to predict thrombocytopenia following abexinostat administration in both patient populations. A model-based approach to determine the recommended dose in phase I trials is preferable due to the imprecision of the 3?+?3 design.
Vincent Croixmarie
Annotations have not been checked.
This model is not certified.
  • Model owner: Vincent Croixmarie
  • Submitted: Feb 12, 2016 5:24:28 PM
  • Last Modified: Feb 12, 2016 5:24:28 PM
Revisions
  • Version: 11 public model Download this version
    • Submitted on: Feb 12, 2016 5:24:28 PM
    • Submitted by: Vincent Croixmarie
    • With comment: Edited model metadata online.

Independent variable T

Function Definitions

combinedError1(additive,proportional,f)=(additive+(proportional ×f))

Structural Model sm

Variable definitions

K67=IKA
K70=ICLIV2
K78=IQ3IV2
K87=IQ3IV3
K79=IQ4IV2
K97=IQ4IV4
V7=IV2IBIO
S7=V7
BAS0=((POP_BAS0 ×exp(ETA_BAS0)) ×(1-PATH))
BAS1=((POP_BAS1 ×exp(ETA_BAS0)) ×PATH)
IMAT=(POP_IMAT ×(1+ETA_IMAT))
K=4MTT0
CP=CENTS7
BASE={(BAS0-(IMAT ×T24)(POP_IT50+T24))  if  (PATH=0)BAS1  otherwise
BASI={BAS0  if  (PATH=0)BAS1  otherwise
MTT={0.001  if  (MTT00)MTT0  otherwise
FBM=BASECIRCGAMMA
FBK=BASECIRCDELTA
E=(POP_IMAX ×CP)(IC50+CP)
dPROLdT=((((K ×PROL) ×FBM) ×(1-E))-((K ×FBK) ×PROL))
dTRA1dT=(((K ×FBK) ×PROL)-((K ×FBK) ×TRA1))
dTRA2dT=(((K ×FBK) ×TRA1)-((K ×FBK) ×TRA2))
dTRA3dT=(((K ×FBK) ×TRA2)-((K ×FBK) ×TRA3))
dCIRCdT=(((K ×FBK) ×TRA3)-(K ×CIRC))
dDEPdT=(-K67 ×DEP)
dCENTdT=((((K67 ×DEP)+(K87 ×PERIF1))+(K97 ×PERIF2))-(CENT ×((K78+K79)+K70)))
dPERIF1dT=((K78 ×CENT)-(K87 ×PERIF1))
dPERIF2dT=((K79 ×CENT)-(K97 ×PERIF2))

Initial conditions

PROL=BASI
TRA1=BASI
TRA2=BASI
TRA3=BASI
CIRC=BASI
DEP=0
CENT=0
PERIF1=0
PERIF2=0

Variability Model

Level Type

DV

residualError

ID

CYCL, parent level: ID

parameterVariability

Covariate Model

Continuous covariate IBIO

Continuous covariate ICL

Continuous covariate IKA

Continuous covariate IQ3

Continuous covariate IQ4

Continuous covariate IV2

Continuous covariate IV3

Continuous covariate IV4

Continuous covariate PATH

Parameter Model

Parameters
POP_IC50 POP_IMAX POP_MTT POP_GAMMA POP_DELTA POP_BAS0 POP_BAS1 POP_IT50 POP_IMAT Y_ADD Y_PROP OMEGA_IC50 OMEGA_IC50_OCC OMEGA_MTT OMEGA_GAMMA OMEGA_DELTA OMEGA_DELTA_OCC OMEGA_BAS0 OMEGA_IMAT
ETA_IC50N(0.0,OMEGA_IC50) — ID
ETA_MTTN(0.0,OMEGA_MTT) — ID
ETA_GAMMAN(0.0,OMEGA_GAMMA) — ID
ETA_DELTAN(0.0,OMEGA_DELTA) — ID
ETA_BAS0N(0.0,OMEGA_BAS0) — ID
ETA_IMATN(0.0,OMEGA_IMAT) — ID
ETA_IC50_OCCN(0.0,OMEGA_IC50_OCC) — CYCL
ETA_DELTA_OCCN(0.0,OMEGA_DELTA_OCC) — CYCL
EPS_YN(0.0,1.0) — DV
log(IC50)=(log(POP_IC50)+(ETA_IC50+ETA_IC50_OCC))
log(DELTA)=(log(POP_DELTA)+(ETA_DELTA+ETA_DELTA_OCC))
log(MTT0)=(log(POP_MTT)+ETA_MTT)
log(GAMMA)=(log(POP_GAMMA)+ETA_GAMMA)

Observation Model

Observation Y
Continuous / Residual Data

Parameters
Y=(CIRC+(combinedError1(Y_ADD,Y_PROP,CIRC) ×EPS_Y))

Estimation Steps

Estimation Step estimStep_1

Estimation parameters

Initial estimates for non-fixed parameters

  • POP_IC50=0.0743
  • POP_IMAX=0.881
  • POP_MTT=95
  • POP_GAMMA=0.498
  • POP_DELTA=0.177
  • POP_BAS0=195
  • POP_BAS1=273
  • POP_IT50=68.2
  • POP_IMAT=101
  • Y_ADD=13.5
  • Y_PROP=0.19
  • OMEGA_IC50=0.663
  • OMEGA_IC50_OCC=0.304
  • OMEGA_MTT=0.087
  • OMEGA_GAMMA=0.097
  • OMEGA_DELTA=0.228
  • OMEGA_DELTA_OCC=0.224
  • OMEGA_BAS0=0.39
  • OMEGA_IMAT=0.842
Estimation operations
1) Estimate the population parameters
    Algorithm FOCE

    Step Dependencies

    • estimStep_1
     
    Help